- #NVIDIA GEFORCE4 TI 4200 VS NVIDIA GEFORCE FX 5200 SOFTWARE#
- #NVIDIA GEFORCE4 TI 4200 VS NVIDIA GEFORCE FX 5200 PROFESSIONAL#
- #NVIDIA GEFORCE4 TI 4200 VS NVIDIA GEFORCE FX 5200 SERIES#
Therefore, the card will manage both CAD software and demanding 3D games of 2013 in high quality settings. The performance is significantly above the level of the older Quadro 5010M and also beats the GeForce GTX 675M. The implementation of this boost mode is done in the BIOS, but it is ultimately dependent upon the manufacturer of the laptop.
#NVIDIA GEFORCE4 TI 4200 VS NVIDIA GEFORCE FX 5200 SERIES#
PCIe 3.0 is now supported by the mobile Kepler series and an optional Turbo mode can automatically overclock the Nvidia card by a theoretical 15 percent if the laptop cooling system allows it. However, due to the missing hot clock of the shader domain, two shaders of a Kepler chip offer similar performance to just one shader of a Fermi chip (as the latter is clocked twice as fast). Although more shader cores are available in the Kepler architecture as compared to the Fermi design, the Kepler shaders are still expected to be up to twice as power efficient. In the K4000M, 5 blocks are active leading to the 960 CUDA cores. The GK104 Kepler core offers eight shader blocks, called SMX, that are clocked at the same speed as the central core. The Kepler architecture is the successor to the Fermi architecture that first appeared in laptops with the GeForce 400M series. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better than GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.
#NVIDIA GEFORCE4 TI 4200 VS NVIDIA GEFORCE FX 5200 PROFESSIONAL#
The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. The Quadro K4000M is built for the Intel Chief River generation (Ivy Bridge) and is the successor to the Fermi-based Quadro 4000M (Huron River platform). It is a Kepler-based GPU built on the GK104 chip (but using only 960 shader cores) and is manufactured in 28nm at TSMC.
The NVIDIA Quadro K4000M is a high-end, DirectX 11.1 compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. NVIDIA Quadro K4000M ► remove from comparison slightly slower Radeon R7 260X by a great margin (gaming). The power consumption as already mentioned is a strong suite for the GTX 750 Ti and it excels the e.g.
In our tests, the 750 Ti was not able to achieve playable framerates in demanding games and highest settings in 1920x1080 (see benchmarks below). The 3D performance lies between the Radeon R7 260X and R7 265X from AMD or between the GTX 750 and GTX 660 from Nvidia. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is comparable to the Nvidia Geforce GTX 860M for laptops that features the same chip with slightly slower clock rates and therefore also performance. The GTX 750 Ti supports DirectX 11.2 but only feature level 11_0. Maxwell sets its focus on energy efficiency and was able to outperform the predecessor Kepler and AMD chips in similar performance regions. It is based on the first generation of the Maxwell architecture, namely the GM107 chip. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti is a mid-range desktop graphics card that was announced early 2014. The GeForce FX Go 5300 was an OEM version for Medion with lower clock (275/250 MHz) and 64 MB RAM.ġ50nm, 1.2 - 1.3 Volt core tension, 4x FSAA, 8x AF, PowerMizer 3.NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti ► remove from comparison It offers multi-screen-support (additional external screen) and DirectX 9 functions.Ĭurrently, it is a competitor of the faster integrated graphic chips like the ATI Radeon Xpress 1150. The NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5200 for laptops has been positioned as a competitor to ATI Mobility Radeon 9200.
0 kommentar(er)
